The issue isn't that Trump threatens; that's part of his political persona. The problem is that he has turned threatening into a permanent linguistic style: a ready-made lexicon of phrases like "we will crush," "we will destroy," "we will erase," constantly accompanied by the promise of "hell," and often seasoned with vulgar terms that have no place in political discourse. These aren't slips of the tongue; this is the discourse itself.

Notably, this language doesn't change with the occasion. It is used in war, in negotiations, and when addressing allies. It's as if the entire world turns into an opponent in a noisy street debate in the president's mind. There's no difference between an official platform and a post on Truth Social. The only difference is that the former is broadcast live, while the latter is hastily written.

Ironically, this approach, despite its apparent chaos, works precisely: it isn't meant to persuade, but to confuse. It raises the stakes to befuddle everyone, then lets them argue over his words, not his actions. Even within his camp, voices are rising. Former allies describe him as "crazy" and "unbalanced," while others speak of a runaway discourse that resembles an angry online account more than a president.

In the end, the danger isn't that the president of the "greatest country in the world" uses foul language, but that this language has become part of the decision-making process. Thus, the question isn't what Trump will do, but what phrase he will release next and how much the world's temperature will rise with it.