The high-stakes gamble to prevent another Middle East war

Opinion 27-06-2026 | 14:35

The high-stakes gamble to prevent another Middle East war

As U.S.–Iran negotiations enter a decisive stage, hopes for a lasting ceasefire are tempered by deep mistrust, domestic political pressures, and unresolved disputes over Iran's nuclear program and regional security.

The high-stakes gamble to prevent another Middle East war
U.S. President Donald Trump (AFP).
Smaller Bigger

The world anxiously awaits the outcome of ongoing communications between the United States and Iran, with the participation of Qatari and Pakistani mediators, to finalize the memorandum of understanding and reach a final agreement that prevents a return to war and transitions the Middle East into a more stable phase.

 

Some observers remain concerned about the contradictory statements issued by American and Iranian officials on key issues, including the nuclear program and the Strait of Hormuz. Both sides face significant domestic challenges in shaping public narratives around the talks and the agreements reached thus far, amid an atmosphere of suspicion and mutual accusations. Washington and Tehran each claim a major victory and maintain that they have imposed their conditions on the other. Although both appear genuinely committed to avoiding a return to war and advancing diplomacy, the increasingly sharp rhetoric and the high political thresholds required to convince domestic audiences of success could jeopardize the negotiations and trigger a renewed conflict, further complicated by Israel's negative role in the negotiations.

 

 

Profit and loss calculations

 

It is too early to determine who has gained more than what has been achieved so far and what the negotiations may lead to later. This can only be assessed when the end of the war is announced and forces return to their bases.

 

The Iranian regime considers its survival an achievement and may be right in doing so. However, the consequences of the war will continue for a period of no less than two years, during which the regime will face major internal challenges and difficulties as a result of many years of sanctions followed by a devastating war and a harsh naval blockade. The amount of Iranian funds that are frozen and that will be released in the coming months will cover only a very small part of what the regime needs to address the economic and social difficulties faced by the population. In addition, part of these funds, not less than 12 billion dollars, will be spent from a special account overseen by Washington to purchase food products of American origin. Therefore, Tehran will not have full freedom to dispose of all its internationally frozen assets.

 

President Donald Trump did not achieve the decisive victory he had hoped for. There was no repetition of the Venezuela scenario, as despite the assassination of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, the alternative leadership insisted on fighting and closed the Strait of Hormuz, causing a global crisis and making matters more difficult for Trump. The US president found himself facing a war scenario requiring the deployment of ground forces, and he had already begun preparing for it. However, such a step would put him in confrontation with his popular base, which he has repeatedly told in his speeches that he would not drag into Middle East wars like his predecessors and that there would be no troops on the ground.

 

Trump also faces another dilemma, which is reaching an agreement that removes the military dimension of Iran’s nuclear program. This can only be achieved by removing highly enriched uranium and ensuring that Iran cannot enrich uranium for two decades. Anything less than that would be considered by US public opinion as a bad deal, very similar to the 2015 agreement signed by President Barack Obama with Tehran and later canceled by Trump, who described it as the worst possible deal. Tel Aviv also doubts Iran’s willingness to accept Trump’s conditions on the nuclear file.

 


Proxies… and the most difficult file

 

President Trump’s team understands that any agreement will not pass easily if Israel’s security is not taken into account. For this reason, it is working on dismantling Iran’s regional proxies and is giving significant attention to Hezbollah in Lebanon. Pressure on the Iraqi government has begun to bear fruit, as most factions of the Popular Mobilization Forces have started handing over their weapons to the state. Including the Lebanon war in the memorandum of understanding is also intended to push Tehran to pressure Hezbollah to halt its military operations and withdraw from south of the Litani, which would facilitate negotiations in Washington and open the way for a permanent solution regarding Hezbollah’s weapons.

 

Iran’s ballistic missiles will be the most difficult issue for Trump. Therefore, diplomatic sources believe that Washington understands it may have to overlook this file in exchange for strengthening the missile defense capabilities of regional countries, and allowing some of them to build their own ballistic missile arsenals to raise deterrence against Iran.

 

It appears that some circles in Tehran believe President Trump is in a predicament and truly think that America has been defeated. As a result, they are exerting strong pressure on Iranian leaders and negotiators not to make concessions on the nuclear file and the Strait of Hormuz. These forces will fall into the same problem that led to the war in the first place, as they did not believe Trump was serious about his threats to wage war against them.

 

The regime may again make miscalculations based on an illusion of power and victory, insisting on its conditions and refusing compromise. Trump has announced that he will not accept the imposition of fees on navigation in the Strait of Hormuz as Iran demands, and he insists on resolving the nuclear issue. He will not be able to sell a deal that does not achieve these two objectives. If he is given a choice between a bad agreement or a return to war that could include sending troops to seize control of the Strait of Hormuz, he will most likely choose war. In that case, the regime would lose a golden opportunity that will not come again.

 

 

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by the writers are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Annahar.