Israel’s reported control of Beaufort Castle reignites debate over heritage and war in southern Lebanon

Opinion 31-05-2026 | 13:40

Israel’s reported control of Beaufort Castle reignites debate over heritage and war in southern Lebanon

Historic fortress, repeatedly damaged in past conflicts, once again becomes a strategic and symbolic flashpoint amid claims of renewed military presence and heightened regional tensions.

Israel’s reported control of Beaufort Castle reignites debate over heritage and war in southern Lebanon
Smoke rises behind Shaqif Castle. (AFP)
Smaller Bigger

 

On Sunday morning, the Lebanese woke up to news announced by the Israeli Broadcasting Authority that “the Israeli army controls Beaufort Castle in southern Lebanon,” after which images circulated showing Israeli soldiers inside the historic site.

 

A few days earlier, the municipality of Arnoun said that Beaufort Castle, considered one of the most prominent archaeological and heritage landmarks, had been bombed by Israel alongside “the demolition of residential houses, the destruction of neighborhoods and infrastructure, and the forced displacement of residents from their land and homes.”

 

The castle has witnessed successive wars since the Crusader era, up to the Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 1982, when it became one of the fiercest battlegrounds between the Israeli army and Palestinian fighters during what was known as the “Battle of Beaufort.”

 

 

Smoke rises behind Beaufort Castle. (AFP)
Smoke rises behind Beaufort Castle. (AFP)

 

 

On June 6 of that year, Israeli forces launched a major military operation to seize the castle, using artillery and air raids that caused parts of it to collapse and lose some of its features. It remained under occupation until Israel’s withdrawal from Lebanon in May 2000.

 

During the years of Israeli occupation of southern Lebanon, the castle was used as a military base and suffered extensive destruction from bombardments, air raids, and fortification works. Restoration efforts began between 2011 and 2015, funded by the Kuwait Fund for Arab Economic Development, during which tunnels, cellars, and a centuries-old rock trench were uncovered.

 

Restoration phases — rehabilitation project (2011–2015): The castle was reopened to visitors in early 2015 after the creation of safe walkways, the construction of an exhibition hall, and the installation of solar-powered lighting at the site.

 

Today, amid the dramatic developments and its reoccupation after 26 years since liberation, Hezbollah would find itself unable and embarrassed to carry out any military operation against Israelis at the castle and its surroundings. The castle was granted “enhanced protection” in 2024 under the second protocol of The Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict.

 

Any drone strike or artillery fire targeting the castle would add to Hezbollah’s record of damaging archaeological sites or causing significant harm to them, which is considered a crime against Lebanon rather than against Israel, which is already accused of aiming to erase Lebanon’s history and culture.

 

Israel destroyed the castle during the 1982 invasion, and it later sustained significant damage during various resistance operations. Today, the question arises: will Hezbollah destroy it if it carries out operations or launches strikes around it? Or will Israel embarrass it by remaining there and turning it into a semi-secure base?

 

 

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by the writers are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Annahar.