No dust, no dollars: Slogans and strategy in the Iran standoff
Behind the rhetoric of “no dust, no dollars,” the real struggle over leverage, timing, and concessions between Washington and Tehran remains far more difficult to resolve.
Messenger
Whatsapp
Threads
Email
Print
X
Facebook
Short, easy to remember slogans paved his way to the presidency. Whether they will help conceal his potential diplomatic failure in a sensitive file remains an open question. The latest of these slogans was “No dust, no dollars.”
When he tried to reassure journalists that there was no truth to reports that Washington was moving toward a weak agreement with Iran, a senior official in US President Donald Trump’s administration used this phrase. It quickly gained the expected traction. The official wanted to stress that no frozen funds would be released unless Tehran handed over its “nuclear dust,” meaning the enriched uranium that the Iranians could use to manufacture a bomb. The reason Trump described uranium as “nuclear dust” remains unclear, but he may have meant uranium that has been damaged and mixed with rubble.
As for slogans, the problem with them is that they simplify reality to the point where it becomes difficult to diagnose it accurately. And even if they reflect reality precisely, they remain difficult to implement. One can consider the circumstances that led to the creation of this slogan.
Trump and Iran: the difficult balance
It appears that Trump reached a balance based on the idea that both sides could emerge with a mutually acceptable double victory. The United States would lift sanctions on Iran in exchange for Iran lifting its restrictions on the Strait of Hormuz. As a result, both the American and Iranian economies would gain some breathing room. However, if the Iranian economy recovers, why would Tehran agree to surrender the uranium? The same US official said that reopening the strait gives the United States a greater gain than what Iran might obtain, roughly half a billion dollars daily. He explained that the blockade “gave us some time to accelerate additional economic leverage points.”
If Iran is refusing or resisting reopening the Strait while under tight sanctions, how would it ever agree to give up handing over uranium, let alone what it considers its “right to enrichment,” after the pressure is eased?
Perhaps the core equation is: “No blockade, no dust.”