Inside the proposed US-Iran deal: Ceasefire, Hormuz, nuclear talks and Lebanon’s future

World 24-05-2026 | 16:58

Inside the proposed US-Iran deal: Ceasefire, Hormuz, nuclear talks and Lebanon’s future

A proposed 60-day truce between the US and Iran could reopen the Strait of Hormuz, ease sanctions, and launch wider negotiations on nuclear tensions and regional conflicts.

Inside the proposed US-Iran deal: Ceasefire, Hormuz, nuclear talks and Lebanon’s future
A couple driving a car with a weapon during their wedding in Iran. (AFP)
Smaller Bigger

 

An intense diplomatic effort is underway between the United States, Iran, and intermediary countries led by Pakistan to reach a preliminary agreement extending the ceasefire for a period ranging from 30 to 60 days, while establishing a framework for upcoming negotiations between the parties that would lead to a final agreement.

 

What do we know about the current potential agreement?

 

Efforts are underway to draft a memorandum of understanding aimed at formally ending the war on all fronts, including Lebanon, as well as reopening the Strait of Hormuz. Discussions on nuclear-related files are expected to be postponed until negotiations begin following an agreement on extending the ceasefire and reopening Hormuz. These negotiations are expected to take place in Pakistan.

What are the terms of the potential agreement?

According to reports, the agreement includes the following key points:

  • Extending the ceasefire for 60 days, during which the Strait of Hormuz would be reopened.

  • The United States would lift its blockade on Iranian ports and grant certain sanctions exemptions, allowing Iran to freely sell oil.

  • Washington would agree to negotiate the lifting of sanctions and the unfreezing of Iranian funds during the 60-day period.

  • Under the agreement, the Strait of Hormuz would remain open without transit fees throughout the 60-day period.

  • The draft memorandum of understanding includes Iranian commitments never to pursue nuclear weapons.

  • Through intermediaries, Iran has provided the United States with verbal assurances regarding the scope of concessions it is willing to make concerning the suspension of uranium enrichment.

  • Negotiations on the Iranian nuclear program would take place during the next phase.

  • American forces deployed in recent months would remain in the region throughout the 60-day period and would not withdraw unless a final agreement is reached.

  • Washington and its allies would refrain from attacking Tehran or its allies, while Iran would pledge not to launch any preemptive military attack against the United States or its allies.


What is the fate of uranium and enrichment?

 

The United States is demanding the export of enriched uranium out of Iran, with several countries being considered to host the uranium, including Russia, China, and Pakistan

 

 

 

Trump has previously insisted that the lifting of U.S. sanctions or the release of frozen Iranian funds would remain conditional on Iran halting uranium enrichment for at least 20 years and committing not to acquire a nuclear weapon.

 

 

The New York Times reported, citing American officials, that Iran had agreed, as part of the deal announced by U.S. President Donald Trump, to give up its stockpile of highly enriched uranium.

Officials explained that the proposal requires Tehran to relinquish this stockpile, though the mechanism for its transfer has not yet been finalized, as the details are to be addressed in later discussions.

Other proposals include converting part of the enriched uranium into nuclear fuel.

 

So far, Iran refuses to offer official concessions related to enriched uranium and future enrichment, postponing this issue to later negotiations.

 

In this context, a senior Iranian source told Reuters that "Tehran has not agreed to surrender its stock of highly enriched uranium," confirming that "the Iranian nuclear file is not part of the preliminary agreement."

 

Additionally, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman, Esmail Baghaei, emphasized that the nuclear file will not be part of the framework of understanding at this stage.

 

He clarified that "at this phase, we will not address the details of the nuclear issue. We know that our nuclear file has been previously used as a pretext for two wars against the Iranian people," adding that "we want the nuclear issue and other matters to be discussed later, within thirty or sixty days, or any agreed time-frame, separately. Our absolute priority at the moment is to end the war."

 

What will become of the Strait of Hormuz?

According to leaks from the potential draft agreement, the Strait of Hormuz would remain open without transit fees during the 60-day period. The United States would also lift its blockade on Iranian ports and grant certain sanctions exemptions to allow Iran to freely sell oil.

 

 

 

However, Iran’s Fars News Agency reported that the memorandum of understanding would allow Iran to manage the strait, adding that what Trump says about reopening it “does not align with reality.” Meanwhile, Tasnim News Agency indicated that, in exchange for Iran allowing oil tankers to pass through the strait at pre-war levels, part of the frozen Iranian funds abroad should be released during the first phase of negotiations.

 

 

Iran is insisting on imposing transit fees on ships passing through the Strait of Hormuz, in what may be viewed as compensation Tehran is seeking as a result of the war.

 

In contrast, the United States, along with Arab and Gulf countries, rejects the imposition of transit fees in the Strait of Hormuz, particularly as international laws prohibit countries from charging fees for passage through straits and natural waterways.

There is a proposal for joint Iranian-Omani management of the Strait of Hormuz, given that the waterway lies between the two countries. Earlier, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi visited Oman, and reports indicate that the visit included discussions on the Hormuz file and the possibility of jointly managing the strait.

What is the fate of the frozen funds?
Iran is seeking the release of its frozen funds abroad as part of the deal, while the United States maintains that no full release of the funds will take place unless it is tied to a comprehensive agreement.

 

The New York Times reported that any final agreement would also include the release of billions of dollars in frozen Iranian assets abroad, though Iran would not gain access to most of these funds unless a comprehensive nuclear agreement is reached.

 

What about Lebanon?

The Axios website revealed that the anticipated agreement between the two sides includes a provision confirming that “the war between Israel and ‘Hezbollah’ in Lebanon will end.”

 

During a memorial for members of the 'Amal' movement.
During a memorial for members of the 'Amal' movement.

 

According to an Israeli officer, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu expressed to Trump his concerns regarding the condition related to ending the war against “Hezbollah.” Reports also quoted an American official as saying that the agreement would allow Israel to take action in Lebanon if “Hezbollah” attempts to rearm itself.

What are the unresolved and deferred negotiation files?

The Iranian nuclear file is expected to be the most prominent unresolved issue, with its details postponed to negotiations that are supposed to take place in Pakistan should the current mediation efforts succeed and an agreement on extending the ceasefire be reached.

In addition, Iran’s support for its regional allies, primarily “Hezbollah,” is also expected to remain a contentious issue. While Israel insists on a complete halt to support for “Hezbollah” and Iranian-aligned factions in the region, the United States stresses that any frozen Iranian funds to be released must not be directed toward Iran’s allies.

For its part, Iran insists on ending the Israeli war against “Hezbollah,” but has not stated whether it intends to continue or halt its support for the group.