Iraq’s heavy burden: Prime Minister Ali Al-Zaydi faces armed factions and sovereignty crisis

Opinion 21-05-2026 | 11:13

Iraq’s heavy burden: Prime Minister Ali Al-Zaydi faces armed factions and sovereignty crisis

As uncontrolled weapons challenge state authority and strain ties with Gulf nations, Iraq’s new government faces a defining test of sovereignty, security, and regional credibility.

Iraq’s heavy burden: Prime Minister Ali Al-Zaydi faces armed factions and sovereignty crisis
Prime Minister Ali Al-Zaydi faces the most complex files (AFP)
Smaller Bigger

 

“The burden is heavy” — a short phrase that headlines every new Iraqi government formation.

 

Behind these two words lies decades of discourse shaped by political failure, corruption, mismanagement, and regional interference — a crisis now compounded by the rise of uncontrolled weapons operating parallel to the state. This has deepened the burden of that legacy, with consequences extending beyond Iraq’s borders to the military targeting of Gulf Arab states, threatening Iraq’s image, international standing, and its ability to function as a fully sovereign state, while further amplifying its losses.

 

Disarmament

 

Ali Al-Zaydi stands before one of the country’s most complex challenges: bringing weapons under exclusive state control. He is attempting to achieve tangible progress where the previous four governments completely failed to implement their programs on the issue.

Although Ali Al-Zaydi included disarmament in his ministerial program and demonstrated determination to establish a roadmap for resolving the issue, achieving it may prove difficult unless he moves decisively toward Tehran. Following the events of October 7, 2023, and the 40-day war in 2026 between the United States and Israel on one side and Iran on the other, it became increasingly evident that the operations and future of these weapons are tied less to Iraq’s national interests than to the requirements of Iranian influence and strategic interests.

The lords of these weapons are unlikely to respond to governmental, political, or even religious appeals, making it necessary for him to present a plan with clear timelines — particularly as he is expected to gain support from forces opposed to the dominance of weapons over decisions of war and state institutions. Such a plan must go beyond dismantlement or integration, and also address the institutional and societal divisions caused by parallel arms, the fractures within the pillars of the state, and the risks of civil conflict or clashes with official institutions, while ending Iran’s use of these groups to threaten regional security through operations targeting Gulf Arab states.

 

Targeting Saudi Arabia

 

The targeting of Saudi Arabia with three drones launched from Iraqi airspace on May 17 — just days after the Iraqi government secured parliamentary confidence — sent a direct challenge to Ali Al-Zaydi and his administration from armed factions, signaling that the decision of war remains monopolized by these groups. They possess the ability to undermine any progress in Iraq’s external relations, whether with Gulf, Arab, or Western states, placing Al-Zaydi’s government before a critical test of trust: preventing any group from threatening Iraq’s Arab neighbors.

The criminal attack against Saudi Arabia will serve as a measure of his ability to translate his ministerial program into a genuine state monopoly over arms, as well as his intentions to reshape relations between Baghdad and Riyadh, along with the rest of the Gulf capitals. These drones target Iraq, its people, and its national security before they target the neighboring Kingdom. They threaten every opportunity for stability and development for Iraq and its citizens. And while such attacks may serve the interests of one state, they ultimately inflict harm on many others — foremost among them Iraq itself.

 

Restoration

 

Fuad Hussein, serving in the government of Ali Al-Zaydi, views restoring relations with the countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council as a priority. However, the use of Iraqi territory by armed factions during the February 28 war as a platform to target the national security of Gulf states — without concrete measures being taken against those entities violating laws and international norms — has turned official Iraq into a “victim of war,” shaking the foundations of those relationships.

 

 

Despite these statements expressing sincere intentions to correct the course, countries across the region will closely monitor, during the first months of Ali Al-Zaydi’s government, how it approaches engagement within the framework of regional security — a role Iraq will be unable to fulfill unless it works toward freeing itself from uncontrolled weapons.

 

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by the writers are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Annahar.