Press freedom under siege: From frontline killings to digital erasure of women journalists

International 03-05-2026 | 20:45

Press freedom under siege: From frontline killings to digital erasure of women journalists

A new global pattern links war-zone targeting of reporters with rising online harassment, deepfakes, and self-censorship that is reshaping journalism itself.
Press freedom under siege: From frontline killings to digital erasure of women journalists
Illustrative image representing the challenges of journalism in the field
Smaller Bigger

 

 

On World Press Freedom Day, a troubling picture emerges: freedom of expression is retreating on two parallel fronts—the first in the physical world, where journalists are being killed, and the second in the digital sphere, where women, particularly female journalists, face increasingly sophisticated forms of violence and silencing.

 

The dangers on the ground continue to claim lives. In southern Lebanon, journalists have been killed while covering clashes since October 2023, raising serious concerns about the targeting of media personnel in conflict zones. Amal Khalil was the latest victim, targeted alongside journalist Zainab Faraj in the southern town of Al-Tiri.

 

According to the Committee to Protect Journalists, 129 journalists were killed worldwide in 2025, including 86 in Gaza, while Sudan and Ukraine were also among the deadliest arenas.

 

 

Screen Violence

 

A joint report by UN Women, The Nerve, and its partners reveals a troubling escalation in digital assaults. Twelve percent of women human rights defenders and journalists reported the non-consensual publication of personal images, including intimate or sexual content. Six percent reported being targeted by “deepfake” technology, while one in three women received unwanted sexual harassment through digital messages.

 

According to the report, this violence is not random but often deliberate and coordinated, aiming to silence women engaged in public life and to undermine their professional credibility and personal reputations. This strategy is becoming a tangible reality: 41 percent of surveyed women said they practice self-censorship on social media, while 19 percent reported restricting their professional work as a result of this violence.

 

 

Self-Censorship

 

For female journalists, the indicators appear even more alarming. In 2025, 45 percent reported practicing self-censorship on digital platforms—an increase of 50 percent compared to 2020—while about 22 percent admitted to self-censoring their own journalistic work.

 

In contrast, a growing trend toward legal confrontation is emerging. The likelihood of female journalists reporting digital violence to the police has doubled to 22 percent compared to 2020, while those who initiated legal proceedings has risen to 14 percent, reflecting increased awareness and determination to hold abusers accountable.

 

 

Press. (Illustrative image)
Press. (Illustrative image)

 

 

The syndicate documented the killing of 32 journalists and 556 violations against media workers, in addition to the closure of media institutions. The leader of the Sudanese Journalists Syndicate, Abdelmoneim Abu Idris Ali, stated that the prize is “an honor for all journalists who continue to defend the truth under very dangerous conditions.”

 

UNESCO Director-General Khaled El-Enany emphasized the “extraordinary courage” displayed by journalists, stating that their commitment constitutes “a vital service to truth, accountability, and peace.”

 

Between digital violence and field bullets, a clear pattern emerges: the targeting of journalism and attempts to silence it. From screens used for defamation and intimidation to frontlines where cameras themselves become targets, journalists remain at the center of confrontation—paying the price for truth and resisting with their voices in a time when the space for freedom is narrowing.