Hezbollah’s future hangs on Iran as Lebanese Army moves to assert control

Region 14-01-2026 | 15:33

Hezbollah’s future hangs on Iran as Lebanese Army moves to assert control

Amid Iran’s internal unrest, Lebanese army pushes to assert state control over Hezbollah, while the party’s fate remains tied to Tehran’s stability and international pressures mount.
Hezbollah’s future hangs on Iran as Lebanese Army moves to assert control
Hezbollah.
Smaller Bigger

While the Iranian regime struggles to contain internal protests that have surpassed all expectations in size, scope, and diversity—marked by extraordinary courage in confronting one of the region’s most entrenched totalitarian systems—Israel has intensified its strikes on Hezbollah’s military infrastructure, expanding them with unprecedented force to areas well beyond the Litani River in southern Lebanon.

 

Since the end of last year, Tel Aviv has shifted its focus to areas north of the Litani River, extending as far as the Al-Awali River near the city of Sidon. This shift sends a clear message: the disarmament of the party in question can no longer be delayed or postponed under any pretext. As President Joseph Aoun stated in an interview last Sunday, the decision has been made and there is no turning back. He went further, calling on the party and its surrounding environment to act with reason and to carefully assess the regional and international landscape, urging that the power of reason take precedence over the logic of force.

 

It’s worth noting that the first phase of the army’s plan has not yet been fully completed, even though it has already allowed the Lebanese army to gain operational control over the area, effectively preventing it from being used as a launchpad for military operations in any direction. In other words, the regional role assigned to the party since its establishment four decades ago—which effectively kept Lebanon’s borders shared between Israel and Iran through its Lebanese armed wing—is being disrupted. This represents a significant step toward strengthening the Lebanese state, even if the party continues to resist complying with the Lebanese government’s decisions of August 5 and 7 of last year, which tasked the army with asserting state control over all weapons and set a framework for disarming non‑state armed groups.

 

However, the second phase remains on hold and has been postponed to next month under the priority of securing urgent support for the Lebanese army. France is working to organize a conference in Paris next February, sponsored by French, Saudi, and American backers, to bolster the army. Yet the conference’s agenda will require significant groundwork, starting with the Lebanese government beginning discussions on the details of the second phase, which covers the area north of the Litani River. The army must swiftly present its detailed plan, including a comprehensive list of requirements to complete this phase—likely to be more complex than the first due to the size of the area, its dense population, the scale of required operations, and the presence of numerous infrastructures and a substantial resident population sympathetic to the party. Added to this is the presence of Palestinian weapons in key camps, notably Ain al-Hilweh, Lebanon’s largest Palestinian refugee camp. As such, the army faces a critical challenge: it must proceed with caution to carry out its mission, while anticipating the party’s potential refusal to comply with government directives, a situation that could trigger a major Israeli military operation as the snow begins to melt in mid-March.

Observers recognize that the fate of the party in question will ultimately be determined from within Iran itself. The survival of the current Iranian regime will directly shape the party’s future in Lebanon. Perhaps this is exactly what Lebanese officials are counting on: that matters unfolding abroad will eventually unravel on their own internally.

 

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by the writers are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Annahar.